"
--
Having watched the Democrats convention in Denver through the last week, which culminated in the truly historical nomination of Barack Hussein Obama as the Presidential candidate, one is tempted to do some comparisons between India and the United States. Talking of historicity of the occasion, it has to be stressed here that it was more historic for the Americans than for us in this part of the world.
Americans----the liberals and the democrats and those changing their mind about the Republicans---- are all going gooey eyed and wiping their tears of joy about what they see as the realization of a 45 year old dream of a black preacher, who had said in Washington DC, “I have a dream—“.
And what was the dream? To see the realization of the American creed, “---- that all men are created equal”. For us sitting across the oceans and with this belief in our mind that America is a great country of opportunity and equality, that this dream took so long to realize is a wonder. A Black man being nominated by a major political party for the Presidentship. And he has still not won, mind you.
That aside for the moment, the American Presidential elections this time around has really woken up the world like never before. Here is this black man with a “funny name”, as his wife Michelle admits, son of a white American mother and Kenyan black father, who has captured the imagination of the world, and has sent hopes soaring among all those who have been discriminated against all these years in that “great” free country.
But do we Indians need to be as much overawed with this “historic” transformation that is on?
Consider this. When that black preacher was making that historic and evocative speech in 1963 even as his fellow-blacks were reeling under racial discrimination, legally mind you, we had already put in place laws against discrimination on grounds of caste, religion, race, colour, 13 years earlier. And who was the person who headed that drafting committee to write those laws? An “untouchable” B.R.Ambedkar. While America is hailing itself today for nominating a black (well, half black actually) as a Presidential candidate, we had elected another “untouchable” once, K.R.Narayanan as President years ago.
As the Democrat primaries were on, there was this euphoria generated about the possibility of the first woman Presidential nominee. But Hilary fumbled somewhere along the way, and had to give way to Obama. The thought of the first woman Presidential candidate and possibly the President was also something Americans were excited about. They thought finally the glass ceiling would be broken. But we here had broken that glass ceiling over 40 years back, by having Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister. We even went on to have a Woman President last year, while America will now have to wait awhile longer, if ever it will, to have one.
And we have Mayawati, another one from the “unwashed classes” who has shown the guts, some would dub it as audacity, to declare her ambition to be the next Prime Minister of India. And it is all part of the accepted democratic game, which we have practiced and nurtured for the last 61 years.
But for Americans reeling under the “black charge” now, it is all a new and overwhelming experience--- as one could see by the number of moist eyes and lumpy throats as Obama made that grand acceptance speech the other night.
And therefore we have very little to emulate the Americans when it comes to dealing with discrimination and biases, and providing equal opportunities for the politically, socially or even educationally discriminated. We do have caste and religious bias in our society and we still have untouchability practiced. But we had the courage to accept it and made laws to combat it much before Americans came to admit it and try to legislate against it. If they had, Martin Luther King would not have been a hero of the oppressed and racially discriminated and their supporters as late as 1963. If they had overcome the racial bias, they would not have been celebrating the nomination of a black man for the Presidentship today. Though the racial discrimination was banned in 1964 through the Civil Rights Act, it took them a full 45 years to reach this stage, and ask the American blacks or even the indigenous Indians (Red Indians), they still feel the oppression even today.
Coming to elections on the other hand, we incidentally have far more effective, fair and uniform system of elections than the United States. It is entirely another matter that some do manage to still abuse the system. But who can forget those pregnant and hanging chads in Ohio, which used the outdated punching system, and confusion in Florida which all resulted in Al Gore losing the elections? Not once in all our elections since 1952 have we witnessed such confusion in counting votes in our country. And never has a loser been declared a winner without a challenge. That could not have been possible under our Election Commission, which has become the envy of the democratic world.
Having said all this, it is not that we don’t have anything to learn from the democratic process in America. Watching the primaries of both Republicans and the Democrats over the last several months, and the way they finally zeroed in on their candidates for the President’s race, is truly enviable. When can we even think of having such transparent, stimulating, open and frank (of course cheeky and nasty too sometimes) contests among the aspirants? When will we shift from concentrating during elections on petty political and personal points, to larger issues concerning the nation and the world? When will the aspirants from within a party aspiring for top political posts come face to face publicly and pit their knowledge, skills and policies?
As one watched all those debates between the Democratic or Republican aspirants, right from the beginning and the elimination process, it was an overwhelming feeling. That the most influential and powerful political family like the Clintons had to finally yield ground to a man from nowhere, like Obama and come on stage in Denver and endorse him, shows the strength and the firm foundations of inner party democracy. An aspect in which we are aeons behind America. Though one sees some initial and hesitant steps being taken by both the Congress and the BJP.
Obama however has made history already and if he does manage to become the President, as many across the democratic world, why even the non-democratic Islamic world, is hoping, he can certainly pick up a thing or two from India.
Comments
Equality ?
Not sure I agree with a lot of the stated points. I think it is parliamentary vs presidential democracies.. In parliamentary democracy
people vote for the party who choose whomever the elected leader is. People do not know who will be the PM when they vote. They vote on
parties who choose whomever. I am sure that Manmohan Singh was not on voters mind when he/she voted for Congress.. In presidential democracy
they deleniate between President and rest of the party. The president is voted in a separate ballot than the rest of the party. All I am
trying to say is that in parliamentary democracies no one knows who will be the PM due to which one can't directly say people voted person
X of this ethnicity or that gender to the office. Its the party that has people's mandate and the party chose whomever they wanted. The PM in a parliamentary democracy need not be 'electable' by the general populace as long as his party decides she/he should be elected. So based on this argument one can't say one country was ahead of the other in terms of voting based on gender/race equality.
social acceptence
it is good compact column which give some interesting caparison between these two countries.
but on the other hand, this is right that America doesn't have a black president till now, but this is also a fact that many black Americans are representing there country in various sector. no one can ignore there impressive presence in sports, Hollywood and service sector. now in our part, president is concern as almost stamp president. prime minister is the key power player, and no dalit have become PM till now.
and by the way sir can u give me any name of a dalit film star or dalit actor actress.
shantanu srivastava
Woman President
Good reading, this Obama column.
But I must say this: Hillary is miles ahead of Pratiba Patil. Look at the content in her speeches in compairision, look at her confidence. We will never be ablt to say this about Pratiba. having a woman as President is no great deal if she is good for nothing...
--Ramesh Menon
caste comparison no relevance
Yes it is really great that a non-white is contesting for Presidentship; in a predominently white country.Mainly because the colour difference is easily seen.Comparision to our caste system has no relevence.
As for enpowering ladies, India has been way ahead for thousands of years. In fact the whole of south-Asia with India as cultural centre had many women in top power post. Few:, Sirimao in Sri Lanka,Mrs Bhutto in Pakistan, two PMs in Bangla Desh,one in Filifines,! Back at home, apart from the names mentioned by you, Nandini Satpathy, Mrs JayaLalitha,and of course Sonia Gandhi(did you purposely left her out?).
I am opting for Obama, because this fellow may really hit at Al-Quieda.
Dr.Baliga
who is following whom
It is an interesting parallel drawn in your article. However, we have to admit that all persons mentioned of having broken the barrier (Indira gandhi, Ambedkar, Narayan etc), have actually come thru meritocracy in our democracy!!. Maybe the current President is a sole political exception.
What is interesting is that American elections are fought more on media than at grassroot levels, but, many Country specifict issues are discussed/debated-hence common man would know the fate he holds. For us, one party's manifesto almost reads same as the other (except the communal angle portrayed thru the eyes of the media)-hence very little to choose.
I will not be surprised, if Mc Cain gets elected dispite hoopla about Obama-many of his talks is for gallery w/o real substance.
I wish we can follow a two party system-we can really race ahead of any democratic country.
shreesha
Did you consciously leave
Did you consciously leave out the mentioning the Mahatma, or was it incidental since he occupy any de facto, dejure or titular power? On second thoughts, you did not mention Lincoln too! Incidentally, there is an interesting article on Obama in this week's issue of the News Week.
Brijesh Kalappa
helloooo SIR
we should probably sit and discuss such interesting things in class sir, reading press conferances which have been graded A+ with golden stars is getting kinda boring. Also, I attended BJP conferance. Lets discuss inner party politics sir and why its so democratic within US parties and next to impossible in India like you said here. I enjoyed reading it!
obama and india
his comments on outsourcing business out of america might make millions of indians working for call centres in india jobless..black or white he might not prove good for the indians......jai sood